Understanding Corrective Distributions

August 21st, 2017
by Jonathan Leidy

RPM_Q3 2017_Pulse Images_Blog Article 1

Money Back is Good, Right?

Refunds can be great if you are referring to tax returns, or money back from an unfulfilling purchase. However, when it comes to your company’s retirement plan, refunds or corrective distributions are red flags indicating a deeper problem. They can be an administrative nightmare for plan sponsors and cause undue stress to highly-compensated employees who may be forced to refile their taxes.

What are Corrective Distributions?

Employees within your workforce are divided into two groups: highly-compensated employees (HCE) and non-highly compensated employees (NHCE).

HCE Table

Both groups have a desire to retire and contribute what they can to the company’s defined contribution plan, however their difference in pay will affect the amount which they can put away annually.

As a check on plan design equality, the IRS requires that both HCEs and NHCEs contribute to their 401(k) plans at similar percentages. If owners and managers contribute at far higher rates than their workers over the course of the year, the amount these executives have “over paid” will be refunded, which poses a problem for all parties involved.

Corrective distributions can be frustrating for both employees and plan sponsors alike. The highly-compensated employees who receive refunds must account for previously tax-deferred savings in their net pay which is then subject to income taxes. For plan sponsors, corrective distributions are burdensome from an administrative standpoint. Repeat offenders may find it difficult to hold onto valuable employees, experience more paperwork, or even face legal ramifications if timely corrections are not made.

The IRS keeps a stern eye out for corrective distributions and requires plans with over 100 employees to run nondiscrimination tests. In 2015, nearly 54,500 401(k) plans failed retirement plan testing, requiring plan sponsors to return nearly $820 million in 401(k) contributions to highly-compensated employees.[1]

What is Nondiscrimination Testing?

Nondiscrimination tests were created to help demonstrate that your plan provides comparable benefits for all employees. To calculate the applicable corrective distribution, the IRS uses a formula called the Actual Deferral Percentage (ADP). The ADP test compares the average salary deferral among HCEs to that of NHCEs as a percentage of pre-tax compensation. The requirements to pass the ADP test are as follows:

If the average ADP for NHCEs is:

  • less than 2%
  • between 2% and 8%
  • More than 8%

Then the maximum Average ADP for HCEs is:

  • 2 times the average ADP for NHCEs
  • the average ADP for NHCEs plus 2%
  • 1.25 times the average ADP for NHCEs

Avoiding Corrections

Establishing a Safe Harbor 401(k) Plan may be one way to avoid costly refunds.  Under a Safe Harbor, if a plan meets certain requirements, the employer isn’t required to perform nondiscrimination tests.

Additionally, optimizing plan design with features such as auto-enrollment and auto-escalation, offering profit sharing contributions, or educating employees on the benefits of participating in a retirement plan may help with testing failures.

Building an effective retirement plan that meets the goals of the company and your employees (HCEs & NHCEs) can be confusing. It’s important to partner with a team like the one at Portico Wealth Advisors that understands these complexities and can help you implement a prudent fiduciary process to assist you and your employees to pursue a meaningful retirement.

To learn more about the ways Portico can assist you and your plan, or to receive a full copy of this quarter’s ON BALANCE Newsletter, simply email us at info@porticowealth.com.

[1] http://www.judydiamond.com/alms-judy-diamond-associates-analysis-reveals-54000-401k-plans-failed-nondiscrimination-testing/